Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:35:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2003 19:35:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 20 13:35:53 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18lwU4-0002D9-00; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:35:52 -0600
Received: from voldemort.bignachos.com
(h00a0cc56d269.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.31.190.121])
by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with ESMTP
id <2003022019352205100k59jqe>; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 19:35:22 +0000
Received: from dsl231-062-080.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.231.62.80]
helo=scabbers.bignachos.com)
by voldemort.bignachos.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18lwTY-0000M3-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:35:21 -0500
Received: from nelson by scabbers.bignachos.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1
(Debian))
id 18lwTY-0002IE-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:35:20 -0800
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Reference to /usr/doc should be /usr/share/doc on
cvs_packages
X-Debbugs-CC: Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-URL: http://bignachos.com
From: Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:35:19 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA,X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--=-=-=
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-20
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The page http://www.debian.org/devel/cvs_packages is the one at fault,
as seen in this patch:
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-patch
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=cvs_packages.patch
--- cvs_packages~ 2003-02-20 11:31:39.000000000 -0800
+++ cvs_packages 2003-02-20 11:32:02.000000000 -0800
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
converting packages to CVS management. It is probably only
interesting for a few people who are not very familiar with CVS and
version management. Also, there is a script in
-<code>/usr/doc/cvs-buildpackage</code>
+<code>/usr/share/doc/cvs-buildpackage</code>
called <code>cvs-pkginit</code> (both the script and the man page are
gzipped), which will print out a synopsis of this HOWTO document.
<p>For example, to convert a package foo, version bar1, Debian revision 3,
--=-=-=
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux scabbers 2.4.20 #2 Tue Jan 7 20:03:25 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--=-=-=--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181803-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2003 10:35:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 21 04:35:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vsmtp2.tin.it (smtp2.cp.tin.it) [212.216.176.222]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18mAWk-0001Pb-00; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 04:35:34 -0600
Received: from donald.duckburg.org (62.211.170.248) by smtp2.cp.tin.it (6.5.033)
id 3E50C314001C75AA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:34:40
+0100
Received: by donald.duckburg.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7E1983E9DE; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:35:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:35:35 +0100
From: Davide Puricelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux donald.duckburg.org 2.4.20-donald5
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,SUBJ_MISSING,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The page was updated, thanks for your report.
Best Regards,
--=20
Davide Puricelli, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.debian.org
Undergraduate Student of Computer Science at University of Bologna
PGP key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+VgD3t3FMESjlf3ARAslTAJ48wzaIUvn1zkBsMUz5SJlxZ6KYlwCgwMPg
DIPAlO4qHedHI+8tWtn5EI4=
=tcJH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--
