On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:11:42AM +0200, Peter Karlsson wrote: > Martin Quinson: > > > I don't like the idea of cvs rm'ing such outdated files. I would prefer to > > find a way to get those pages not offered by the webserver by default, but > > still available if the user do click on a special link like "see the old > > translation". > > That's not very easy to implement on the web server side. And besides, if > the page has fallen behind as much, I think we're doing our users a > disservice serving it, even if it is marked as outdated, because people will > still read the translation and not the original. > > Remember that this is only for extremely outdated, in effect unmaintained, > translations. It's the same kind of clean-up that we do of the archives > for orphaned packages. I think it makes sense to do it for orphaned > translations.
Yeah. I guess you're right. Where do you put the limit then (sorry if you already said that I fail to remember) ? One year ? Six months ? And what if the change was just a typo fix in english and the translators never bothered updating its number? I think this should keep manual, and not automatic... Bye, Mt. -- This message has been made up using recycled ideas and language constructs. No tree has been cut nor animal harmed in process of making it.
