On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:19:17PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:25:28PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > [...]
> > 1.) use naming scheme 1 for all documents and file bugs against
> > non-conforming ones
> > 2.) dito, but use scheme 2
> > 3.) let support www.debian.org/doc/ support both schemes
> >
> > Which one is it? (I can take care myself of 3 or file the bugs related
> > to 1 or 2)
>
> We need to agree not just these but many more for consistency.
>
> I like 1) but if 2) is chosen, we may do like
> <manual>.pt_BR.ISO-8859-1.{txt,ps,pdf}
> or
> <manual>.pt_BR.UTF-8.{txt,ps,pdf}
> [...]
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/ddp-policy/ddp-policy.en.html
> and see
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/ddp-policy/Ok, if I interpret your mail (and the ddp policy draft )correctly the answer is actually "I like 1, and that also what's in the ddp-policy draft. But bug reports are not quite good, because there is no consensus yet and the policy is still a draft". Correct me if I got anything wrong. Based on this I will propose a patch for the www pages which enables them to support both naming schemes. This will at least give the users correct links... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
