* Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-08 13:08]: > Modified files: > english/News/weekly/2004/01: index.wml > > Log message: > Rephrased paragraph about meta-gnome2, keeping it out hinders proper > GNOME, > not the other way around.
Uhm, I am not sure if I understand your correction correctly: Can
someone please proofread if the correction is in fact correct?
#v+
<code>meta-gnome2</code> packages. He listed 13 packages that bear one or
more problems. Each of them is a reason to keep <code>meta-gnome2</code> out
-of the testing distribution, which is required for proper GNOME in sarge.
+of the testing distribution, which stops proper GNOME in sarge.
#v-
From my understanding the old version was more clear. meta-gnome2 is
required for proper GNOME in sarge.
Oh, I see your misunderstanding: You think the "which" corresponds to
the keeping out of meta-gnome2, not meta-gnome2 itself. But your change
doesn't really clear what the which corresponds to.
Can someone please suggest a rephrase to make it clear?
Alfie
--
mknod /dev/aha c sky earth
-- me, 08/2000
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
