Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2003 10:31:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 03 05:31:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (smtp.uc3m.es) [163.117.136.123]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uUvJ-0000RK-00; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 05:31:37 -0500
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBFB434B8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from arpa.it.uc3m.es (arpa.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.120])
by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09972B674
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from oboe.it.uc3m.es ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [163.117.139.101])
by arpa.it.uc3m.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA32046
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:25:55 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by oboe.it.uc3m.es (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h83APtq04524
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:25:55 +0200
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:25:55 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Anonymously-To:
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: gcc-2.95_1:2.95.4-11woody1
On http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/gcc-2.95.html, the source
code link is not present. It says:
View the list of files in gcc-2.95
Check for bug reports about gcc-2.95
Source Code: Not found
Debian GCC maintainers ...
Nor can I locate it via ftping on over and looking. In fact, I am
having trouble locating source via ftp for any of stable.
ftp.debian.org only has a Sources.gz list in dist/stable/source
Peter
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 208513-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:05:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:05:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References:
In-Reply-To:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):
* Contain information about non-i386 packages
Closes: #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
Closes: #23350 merged bug
Closes: #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated
* Include DDTP translations
* Better parsing/using of input data
Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared
* Handle virtual packages
Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies
* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages
Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big
* Minor fixes:
Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for
related packages when none of them exist
Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone
Closes: #219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug Closes:
#221114: packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview
I will leave "#224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not
restored" open until search_packages is back, too.
Special thanks to Joey for his work to get this done and to Joy for his
feedback while writing the scripts.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
