Your message dated Sat, 1 May 2004 00:55:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as
"kdenetwork"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2004 05:57:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 09 21:57:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.tor.primus.ca (smtp7.primus.ca) [216.254.136.21]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B0wir-0006HS-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 21:57:41 -0800
Received: from dsl-207-112-59-201.tor.primus.ca ([207.112.59.201])
by smtp7.primus.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1B0vvD-0004JT-0A
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 05:06:23 +0000
From: Guillaume Pratte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:58:29 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.1.5-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
On packages.debian.org, kmail' sources are incorrectly reported as
"kdenetwork" (should be kdepim).
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux giga 2.6.2 #1 Sat Feb 7 15:38:56 EST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_CA, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_CA)
Dependencies not provided because I did not yet install kmail 3.2.1.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 237171-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2004 22:56:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 30 15:56:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BJgvL-0002xo-00; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:56:03 -0700
Received: from pd9530439.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.4.57] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1BJgvK-0001aN-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 01 May 2004 00:56:02 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BJgvG-0001cJ-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 01 May 2004 00:55:58 +0200
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 00:55:58 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as
"kdenetwork"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:23:52AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 23:58]:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> >> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail
> >
> > Yeah, it's kind of a bug and I also know his cause. The scripts currently
> > use always the information applying to the greatest number of
> > architectures.
>
> Only partly: The version number of the source got used from the latest.
> This is immensly misleading, because especially in this case it makes
> the link going to the wrong source code which isn't able to compile
> kmail at all.
>
> I have no objection to use the information from the widest used version
> (although the latest would make more sense to me), but please use *all*
> information from the widest used version, then, not only part of it.
The scripts now use the newest version correctly for determing the
source package name. I also use the maintainer of the newest version,
too.
I had no time to check all the packages for information that really
changed. The only ones I found had been kernel packages that have other
problems... e.g. one should take a look at
http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/kernel-headers-2.4.17.html and
tell me how I should determine the source package there... :(
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
