* Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-02 06:31]: > IMHO six months without any reaction from the translation team *is* > "way too out-dated". Personally, I would have liked to have the limit > be even stricter.
Seconed.
> The translation-check header is already used- when the translation
> falls behind, it gets a notice on the page, and after six months the
> translation is purged. We do get enough complaints and bug reports
> about broken links and misinformation which is due to translations not
> being updated in time that I believe that the current practice is
> warranted.
The thing is quite clear documented on /devel/website/translation_hints:
,--------------------------------> quote <--------------------------------
| It is important that you only translate files that you have the time to
| maintain. A few well maintained pages is much more useful than a lot of
| out of date ones.
`--------------------------------> quote <--------------------------------
It is even written in bold letters...
If I might pick this up: Can the translators of the following languages
pretty please update their CD/http-ftp/index.wml file, it fails to build
due to being outdated:
-) dutch
-) italian
-) spanish (hey, Javier!)
Thanks in advance,
Alfie
P.S.: The build failure occurs because
english/CD/http-ftp/cdimage_fsn_mirrors.list isn't there anmore but
still referenced in these translations.
--
shit, fixed, updated.
-- Michael Bramer, debian-www, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
