Hi, On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:47:32PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-15 08:55]: > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:58:11AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: > >> Package: www.debian.org > >> Severity: normal > >> Tags: patch > >> > >> We can use the last eight hex digits of the *fingerprint* in this and > >> other GnuPG operations and not the last eight hex digits of the *key*. > >> Or am I wrong? > > This is only true for special keys.... In fact its the last eight hex > digits of the *key ID*. That they match the fingerprint for gnupg keys > is a nice benefit, but not the rule for all keys.
Do you example of keys where this is not the case ?
> The whole texting though is quite GnuPG centric, so I am not sure if
> this distinction is really needed here. Just wanted to raise the
> concern and that sometimes the last eight hex digits of the fingerprint
> doesn't help at all.
Probably, but I suppose that nearly everybody is using gnupg. A very few
people are using pgp those days.
> > You are right. I've just fixed it in the CVS. It should be available on
> > our website in several hours.
>
> Pierre, are you sure about this change that it is really better?
Yes it is. Because, it is sure that the last 8 digits are not those of
the key. In most cases these digits are the last 8 digits of the
fingerprint. Do not forget that in the beginning we were speaking of the
8 lastest digit of the key.
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
