tags 284082 patch
thanks mate

Anton,
I don't know where the source for the web is, so I've hacked the
html from   http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata

Does this say it correctly?

Vince

--- errata.htm.orig     2004-12-04 12:21:26.000000000 +1100
+++ errata.htm  2004-12-04 12:38:46.000000000 +1100
@@ -104,8 +104,24 @@
        <li><b>LVM failure on Sparc32 (at least).</b>
        If you want to create LVM volume groups, the physical volumes must not
        reside at the beginning of the disk, or else activating new logical
-       volumes within the volume group will fail. This is due to some
-       unforeseen quirks in Sun disk labels.
+       volumes within the volume group will fail.
+        <p>
+       This happens because the Sun disk label resides at the beginning
+       of the disk and the first partition may start from the beginning
+       of the disk. Hence the partition table becomes part of the first
+       partition. Most file systems are smart enough not to write data
+       at the start of their partition (which in this case clobbers the
+       partition table). Two important types of partition where data
+       <em>will</em> be written to the start of the partion are the physical
+       volumes for LVM or RAID, and swap space.
+        </p>
+       <p>
+       Therefore, on Sparc32 (at least) users may <strong>not</strong> create
+       swap space partitions, or partitions for LVM or RAID at the
+       <em>beginning</em> of the disk. If users do this, the partition table
+       will subsequently be completely erased when the partition is used,
+       for example when booting a freshly installed system.
+       </p>
        </li>
        <li><b>2.6 install have the potential to mess up Windows 
partitioning.</b>
        The fixes the the 2.6 CHS issue in parted are apparently

Reply via email to