Your message dated Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:51:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2004 04:52:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 06 21:52:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from aktaia.intevation.org (mail.intevation.de) [212.95.126.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CFQGj-0003SA-00; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 21:52:46 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.intevation.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57403724A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 06:52:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from thetis.hq (thetis.hq [192.168.11.13])
by mail.intevation.de (Postfix) with SMTP
id 2BF4B36F62; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 06:52:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 28258 invoked by uid 10004);
Thu, 07 Oct 2004 04:52:31 -0000
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 06:52:31 +0200
From: Thomas Arendsen Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.debian.org: duplicated responsible persons
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-10-07
Severity: minor
http://packages.debian.org/testing/admin/module-init-tools contains
the following sentence: "Marco d'Itri, Marco d'Itri and Christopher
L Cheney are responsible for this Debian package."
Marco d'Itri is listed both as Maintainer and as Uploader. I haven't
checked the packaging guides, but if this is valid,
packages.debian.org should filter out duplicates. Otherwise this
report has to be reassigned to module-init-tools.
Thomas
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://intevation.de/~thomas/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 275279-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2005 00:54:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 09 16:54:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cnnoo-0007KS-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:54:02 -0800
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Cnnmp-000477-UU
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:51:59 +0100
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:51:59 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
I've fixed that.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
