On Sunday 23 July 2006 22:27, MJ Ray wrote: > I cannot see a grammatical _error_ in the above paragraph, > but a repeated "and" is sometimes considered bad style, so > s/ and is/. It is/ if you want. Any other ideas?
Alternative could be 's/ and is/, and is/', but your suggestion is fine too. Do wonder if it is really worth fixing though. Cheers, FJP
pgpZQd64gBKYC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
