* Ingrid Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-30 16:04]: > * Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-29 22:50]: >> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:43:06AM +0200, Frédéric Bothamy wrote: >>> Does anyone know if something recently changed on www-master (maybe some >>> locales were changed?) ? >> >> Maybe it was already updated to Etch? > > I would guess so, too.
And the guess was right, the locale file was almost empty besides
english...
#v+
Generating locales...
en_GB.ISO-8859-1... done
en_US.ISO-8859-1... done
ar_YE.ISO-8859-6... done
bg_BG.UTF-8... done
hr_HR.ISO-8859-2... done
cs_CZ.ISO-8859-2... done
da_DK.ISO-8859-1... done
eo_EO.UTF-8... done
[EMAIL PROTECTED] done
fr_FR.ISO-8859-1... done
de_DE.ISO-8859-1... done
id_ID.ISO-8859-1... done
ja_JP.EUC-JP... done
no_NO.ISO-8859-1... done
ru_RU.KOI8-R... done
sl_SI.UTF-8... done
sv_SE.ISO-8859-1... done
uk_UA.UTF-8... done
Generation complete.
#v-
That should be most - some locales though still yield problems:
farsi and lithuan also cleared with some further investigation, leaves
only chinese left:
From chinese/.wmlrc:
-D CUR_LOCALE=zh_CN
-D CHARSET=big5
From locale:
$ grep zh_CN /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED
zh_CN.UTF-8 UTF-8
zh_CN.GB18030 GB18030
zh_CN.GBK GBK
zh_CN GB2312
There doesn't seem to be any big5 locale - is generating one of the
others sufficient? Which one? Should the .wmlrc and/or the translated
files be updated/converted?
So long,
Alfie
--
The following two statements are usually both true:
There's not enough documentation.
There's too much documentation.
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
