On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Jens Seidel wrote: > Bugs/server-control contains: > > <dt><code>archive</code> <var>bugnumber</var> > > <dd>Archives a bug that was previously archived if the bug fulfills > the requirements for archival, ignoring time. > > This sounds strange to me. Should it be unarchived instead of archived?
No, this is correct. > Does there exist other criteria, except time, for archival? And no, time is not a factor for this command. > Is it possible to archive a bug which was not yet archived in the > past? No, it's not. > * Don, please try to write XHTML compliant code at least for new > stuff, e.i. close tags properly. Uh... those tags don't need to be closed, actually; I probably should go through and close all of them, but I've just been following the pre-existing examples. Don Armstrong -- [A] theory is falsifiable [(and therefore scientific) only] if the class of its potential falsifiers is not empty. -- Sir Karl Popper _The Logic of Scientific Discovery_ ?21 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
