-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Atterer wrote: > Yes, I know what you mean... :-/ I feel the same, but I thought that the > list would become more readable for >90% of the users, while only making > usage /slightly/ less comfortable for the remaining users. Anyway, as I > said the list of arches is often outdated; non-PC users will currently > click on links only to find that their arch isn't offered after all by a > vendor. I guess I'm mostly worried by certain common cases. Take for example the 93 vendors who just offer i386 media and consider somebody that needs amd64 discs. Grouping architectures together would still affect a decent amount of people, I think. The fact that the list may be outdated is another bad problem, though- perhaps emails could be sent to try and verify the information?
> WRT the URLs: I think the "Debian URL" is the more important one for > people. Would it make sense to use that URL for the vendor name and to add > a "Home" or similar link? (Or possibly a small home symbol?) Ooh, good idea- I've added this now. Thanks, Ricky -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGlnavZBKKLMyvSE4RAvgPAJ9SzMS/dxmgNfKPLmDkSaakonNVpwCg5JIh qMGYyUBLJ93w4NRQzFnl5Ks= =qaf6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
