Hi, In reviewing and committing the Japanese translation, I found "NULL pointer deference" in the English text of DSA 1358, which I think should be "NULL pointer de*re*ference". Since I'm not a native English speaker, however, I don't know whether "deference" is also OK or not and whether I should fix it or not, and I provide a patch here. Could you apply it, or tell me that it's no problem?
Thanks, -nori
Index: english/security/2007/dsa-1358.wml =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/2007/dsa-1358.wml,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 dsa-1358.wml --- english/security/2007/dsa-1358.wml 26 Aug 2007 09:17:43 -0000 1.2 +++ english/security/2007/dsa-1358.wml 17 Sep 2007 13:20:30 -0000 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ <li><a href="http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-1306";>CVE-2007-1306</a> - <p><q>Mu Security</q> discovered that a NULL pointer deference in the SIP + <p><q>Mu Security</q> discovered that a NULL pointer dereference in the SIP implementation could lead to denial of service.</p></li> <li><a href="http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-1561";>CVE-2007-1561</a> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ <li><a href="http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-2294";>CVE-2007-2294</a> - <p>It was discovered that a NULL pointer deference in the manager + <p>It was discovered that a NULL pointer dereference in the manager interface could lead to denial of service.</p></li> <li><a href="http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-2297";>CVE-2007-2297</a> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ <li><a href="http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-3763";>CVE-2007-3763</a> <p>Chris Clark and Zane Lackey discovered that several NULL pointer - deferences in the IAX2 implementation could lead to denial of + dereferences in the IAX2 implementation could lead to denial of service.</p></li> <li><a href="http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-3764";>CVE-2007-3764</a>
