On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On a more general note, I understand the lack of interest to preserve access > for me when I don't contribute to stuff. I didn't make myself useful, so I > got cut off. That's fine. However, I have little understanding for when my > access is a priori revoked on certain niche things where I'm almost the only > person who cares about them, and mirrors are one such thing. It's utterly > unreasonable to bar me from accessing those things simply because of the > history.
Technically existing access was never revoked. You simply never had access to the new infrastructure ;) But the get serious again: Honestly my motivation to work on reenabling access for debwww and webwml would probably have greatly improved with, like, patches sent to me... > Initially, when I humbly asked for access to p.d.o stuff in general to be > restored on 2007-05-30, I got rather rudely rejected by Martin Schulze, and > this was not remedied - rather, my request for explanation was completely > ignored. For the record: I have no objections allowing debwww access to puccini (and I have no idea why Joey reacted the way he did). I'm a bit wary on allowing sudo access to pkg_user without a single proof that the members have looked at the new code and understand how to work on it. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
