On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 05:06:37PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:57:40PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2007, 13:38 +0200 schrieb Simon Paillard: > > > Noticing that hurd-i386 was missing in > > > http://www.debian.org/mirrors/submit but available on mirrors, I > > > wondered why and found that hurd-i386 is missing in lenny/release.data > > > > You might also notice that m68k is missing in the list but available on > > mirrors. > > Actually, m68k and hurd-i386 are on the mirrors only for sid, not for > lenny (see http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/ ) > > > > Is it on purpose or may I add hurd-i386 safely ? > > > > Hmm, which brings me to the point, why is it looking at > > lenny/release.data and not etch/release.data because etch is the stable > > release architecture? > > I guess we should create a sid/release.data to match architectures > available in http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/
Yes, that makes most sense. I went for lenny because that was the newest available at the time, but since then, testing and sid diverged, and for mirrors we actually want everything that's in debian/. -- Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
