I was part of a licencing argument back when .net was migrated to .org. The .net content had a licence which was most clearly not DFSG, and essentially stated that the content was owned only by the contributors, and nobody had the right to copy it. Yet we imported it wholesale into .org without regarding whether the data was even useful. I expect the vast majority of it was not.
As a result, I don't believe a single over-arching licence can be applied to the wiki content, and certainly not retroactively. The only way to continue forward is for new content to be explicitly marked as being a given copyright. We discussed various ways of achieving this too, but the admins weren't interested in implementing them. I'll see about digging out references to the older discussions. -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
