On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 18:02 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Le April 3, 2009 03:10:17 am Frank Lin PIAT, vous avez écrit : > > There is a kind of implicit rule on this wiki... > > wiki pages are like packages, they are maintained by some Teams/People. > > (DebianInstaller/* are managed by DI team, WiFi/* pages are managed by > > Geoff Simons and a few others, DebianEdu/* are managed by Holger a few > > others ...). > > It doesn't prevents other people from contributing. But if the > > maintainer don't like one's patch... well that person should try to > > understand why his/her patch were rejected and talk to the maintainer. > > I see your parallel with packages, but Wiki pages aren't packages. > That page used to have no edit restriction, so I didn't suggest a > patch - I "committed" my changes directly.
The main difference I see is that the moderation is done after the commit, not before. > [..] Sune [..] reverted [the change]. So, I verified my changes, > improved my version, That was the right thing to do. <my experience> In case of conflict, I noticed that it help to split the contribution in multiple commits, starting with the most important _and_ less intrusive ones, finishing with the less important and more controversial ones. All with good commits logs. </my experience> > > Note: the wiki changelog is a very effective communication tool, when > > it's used as such. (i.e say what you do and why you did it). > I could have used better edit summaries. My changes improve > presentation, and note that part of the page (regarding PackageKit) > deserves expansion. > > > P.S. Chealer, you can use a /Discussion page to submit you ideas. > Since I currently can't edit the content page, I couldn't link to such a page. Implicitly, my offer included the fact that I would have added the link. Thanks, Franklin ---- YABM -Yet another bolder maintainer ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
