On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 11787 March 1977, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > Mirroradm, should syncing the webpage continue to be in > > mirroradm/archvsync's domain? That is, do you want do maintain that > > part? Debwww, what would you prefer? Having mirroradm do it or running > > the stuff as debwww on both klecker and senfl? > > I wouldnt have a problem with having mirroradm also do this. > It just wasnt clearly defined (or i didnt know it was) in the past to be > so, so i touched it as less as possible. But its not that much work at > all and easy enough to do, so fine for me to keep in mirroradm if -www > agrees.
That's fine with me, FWIW. -- Matt Kraai http://ftbfs.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
