On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > I've just noticed that in the list of releases at the end of > www.debian.org/releases/index.*.html, we just mark testing, stable, and all > the rest as "obsolete stable release". > I think it would be useful to specify oldstable and the one(s) that are under > long term support.
It might be a good idea to consult the release team about this. > Attached you can find a diff as a proposal. Personally I think I prefer to use the English terms, but maybe putting the tech jargon in quotes next to the codenames would be best? > I'm not sure about the term "oldoldstable" (is "old <q>oldstable</q>" better? > I've seen the former in the Debian wiki, that's why I wrote it like that). All of <q>stable</q>, <q>oldstable</q> and <q>oldoldstable</q> are suite names that are technical jargon that users usually won't interact with outside of the sources.list file. I wonder if a table would be a better way to structure the list, we could take some inspiration from Ubuntu or other distros and list the dates. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
