Hi Antoine, On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:15:15AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > >> How does that sound? > > sounds very good to me. thanks for your work on this so far! > Right, agreed. :) I guess the script could both parse previous emails > and future ones quite easily. yup, that would be cool.
> The problem we have right now is we have no feedback from the www team > on the patches proposed in #859122 so I don't know if the formatting is > alright. I've just asked on #debian-www to comment: [15:37] < h01ger> | it would be very nice if you could comment on the patches proposed/linked in #859122 - those are https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/41 and https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/42 and https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/43 I also note #859122 is not marked 'patch'. > Nor is it promising for the promptness with which the team can > respond to our constant flurry of such MRs in the future... I'm not this pessimistic: first, (after a while) those patches should be pretty clear ones and they will know that. second, I do think that in the long term we should just be able to directly push our DLAs on the website, without a (human) proxy. > > So I've just requested webwml access from the debian-www folks. > ... where did you do that? on salsa. I was also granted access 4 weeks ago it seems :) > Considering that the patches I proposed now 3 weeks ago haven't been > merged, it seems it would be imperative for all LTS people to have > access to the www repository in our workflow. Or at least a significant > numebr of people. Otherwise we'll just be clogging their review queue > forever. agreed. and as said (previously): for a start being i'm happy to act as a human proxy... > I've requested access as an individual, for what that's worth. you were given access a week ago, too. \o/ > I've also got feedback from larjona on IRC, saying she didn't have time > to work on this yet, but ping'd the team to see if someone else > will. Otherwise she might be able to review our work in January. that's almost like next week ;) > I wonder if we could consider more automation here to remove the manual > push/pull process, because it seems it will be a significant source of > friction in our process in the future... sure, more automation = better. > Anyways, hopefully we'll figure out a workflow soon enough. :) I'm confident we will, eventually. #859122 was filed >18 months ago, so I don't think it's suddenly urgent, though I fully agree it would be more than nice to have this fixed before the bug is two years old. -- cheers, Holger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
