Hi, I wouldn't consider having Chinese or Korean support disqualifies the this as a webfont. Actually, using Chinese web fonts without proper subsetting can result in large (2MB~) file loading, therefore it is a disadvantage.
Most Chinese and Korean websites only apply webfonts for Latin patters. I think styling is a small part that contributes to the quality of the website. Content is the king, and we should have better content for the homepage. Yao Wei (This email is sent from a phone; sorry for HTML email if it happens.) > Carsten Schoenert <[email protected]> 於 2019年6月17日 14:33 寫道： > > Am 16.06.19 um 08:58 schrieb Carsten Schoenert: > ... >>> This font doesn't appear to have support for all the languages >>> supported by the Debian website. >> >> This criteria from Paul is a serious requirement. Have a look at the git >> tree of the webwml repository to see which languages are currently used >> within the Debian websites on www.d.o >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml > > Given the information I've found about the Rubik font on fontsquirrel > this font is lacking at least the support for Chinese, Hebrew and > Korean. This will disqualify the font for using within the website I'd say. > > https://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/rubik > > -- > Regards > Carsten Schoenert >
