>>>>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 23:31:02 +0100, "Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas"
>>>>> <[email protected]> said:
> second, having looked at the freebsd and archlinux wikis, I'm starting to
think
> that:
> - high quality content is about boring process (doing small, well scoped
> changes, much like one would do with code; having people actively
review them;
> and roll back changes when they don't follow certain
clearly-communicated
> guidelines)
> - the choice of engine has little to do with the quality of the content
(as much
> as I struggle to bring myself to use a web-based editor, I would not be
> surprised if I'm in the minority in wanting a git interface)
+1, +1
I think Debian has to think about what content we would like to have
in our wiki. We need some simple (!) rules and people who review
the content and also can say "no, thanks, that does not fit into our
wiki". The last thing would be something very new to our wiki. A
filter process so we get better content.
Do we want to continue our wiki as is, or move more to a better qualitiy
wiki like arch linux has?
--
best regards Thomas (who already removed thousands of pages from
our web site)
