On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 01:51:31PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:39:10 +0000, Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> >>>>>> said: > > > Why remove documentation on what has been considered and done in the > > web team? What harm are those pages causing? >To improve the ratio between good and outdated content.
Just because content is not super-fresh, that does not make it *bad*. What happens when people start planning another project and look for documentation about what was considered and what happened last time, for example? This is *not* user-facing documentation, this is documentation about what has been worked on inside the web team. By all means move/rename it under the team's area in the wiki, but *don't* just remove it because it's old. Deletion of history *for the sake of it* is not helpful. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] 'There is some grim amusement in watching Pence try to run the typical "politician in the middle of a natural disaster" playbook, however incompetently, while Trump scribbles all over it in crayon and eats some of the pages.' -- Russ Allbery
