[ Please observe Mail-Followup-To: if you don't mind, I susbcribe to *and*
read debian-x, I don't need another copy on my inbox ]
>> "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Basically the DRM modules in 4.1.0 are not in sync with 2.4.7. I
>
> THis is correct. 4.1.0 DRM and 4.0.3 are not compatible, and
I didn't mean that. What I meant is that, according to the messages I
attached, the DRM sources in the 2.4.7 *kernel* tree are not the same
as those in the 4.1.0 *X server* tree. Since the X server (more
precisely, the DRI modules) expect a specific version of the DRM
interface, compiling the DRM support from the kernel insn't enough to
get a working DRI setup (d�j� vu)
But Mike is right, the old modules are also useless, too. I wish we
had a way to express this via dependencies, but I don't see a simple
way of doing that given the variables involved.
--
Marcelo | "Oook?"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
