[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam C Powell IV writes:
>
>>and 600a from debian/held-patches. No rocket science here, I just had
>>to tweak it a bit to use the inx/outx prototypes from libc, specifically
>>sys/io.h. The last two differ from what's there now only in line
>>
>
>Whoa, this is dangerous talk. I think X and libc have differing views
>on what order the parameters to outx() go in. Extreme caution is
>advisable if you are making changes in this area.
>
Hmm, the 600 patch in debian/held-patches specifically says:
+/* for Linux on ARM, we use the LIBC inx/outx routines */
+/* note that the appropriate setup via "ioperm" needs to be done */
+/* *before* any inx/outx is done. */
+
+static __inline__ void
+xf_outb(unsigned short port, unsigned char val)
+{
+ outb(val, port);
+}
This is basically what I used in my 311 patch. So this inline routine
reorders the parameters.
>I can make you an account on one of the armlinux.org machines if you
>want somewhere to build this stuff, just let me know.
>
Cool! I just realized there's one more thing I can try, so I'll do that
and reply offline if it doesn't work.
Thanks much,
--
-Adam P.
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!
<http://lyre.mit.edu/%7Epowell/The_Best_Stuff_In_The_World_Today_Cafe.ogg>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
