On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:43:56AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> despite your comments in debian/rules and debian/changelog,  I am pretty
> sure that running debconf2po-update in debian/rules is meaningless.
> You might want to call it in order to update PO files, but
> xserver-xfree86-dbg has nothing to do with it.  Here is a patch.
> If you find some behaviour changes, please let me know.

How does po-debconf know those templates belong to the
xserver-xfree86-dbg package otherwise?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |
Debian GNU/Linux                   |         De minimis non curat lex.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: msg05001/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to