On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:08:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:29:22PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> > Modified:
> >    branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/rules
> >    branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/scripts/vars.s390
> > Log:
> > Move DRM stuff to be in !NOT_BUILDING_XF86_SERVER, not !NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER,
> > and declare that s390 builds no servers whatsoever, not just not building the
> > xf86 server, hopefully fixing s390 FTBFS.
> 
> That's a regression, then:
> 
>      xnest |    4.2.1-6 |      unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, 
> mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
>       xprt |    4.2.1-6 |      unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, 
> mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
>       xvfb |    4.2.1-6 |      unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, 
> mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> 
> This should be investigated.  s390 should be able to build xnest, xvfb,
> and xprt.  Losing xvfb will kill some Tk and Python-related stuff that
> absolutely insists on having a live X server just to build.

Hmmmmm ... ok, I'll revert vars.s390, but d/r is there to stay. Either
way, it should fix the s390 FTBFS.

-- 
Daniel Stone         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to