On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 12:54, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > > The libGLs provided by Mesa and XFree86 aren't the same. In particular, > > the former can't use direct rendering, while the latter can't use plain > > X11 rendering. > > > > The libGLUs OTOH are both taken from the SGI sample implementation. _If_ > > there are any significant changes to libGLU, they will much more likely > > appear in Mesa first. Maintaining xlibmesa-glu as well is a waste of > > effort. > > OK, I can see this, and will add the re-org to the pre1v2 list.
Thank you. I can look into doing it myself if that would be helpful, but my time is tight and I might have to get familiar with subversion first. > Any ideas on what we should call xlibmesa-drm-src and xlibmesa-gl? Time for a little brainstorming session? :) drm-xfree86-module-src ? (I don't really like drm-trunk-module-src etc. either though, so if anybody has a better idea... :) I can live with xlibmesa-gl, though I like xlibmesa-gl1 better. Another random idea would be libgl1-xfree86 . -- Earthling Michel D�nzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
