On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:11, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Michel D�nzer wrote:
> > > Why isn't Mesa 5's libGL built as well?
> > 
> > *sigh* How many times will we have to walk this through yet?
> > 
> > The libGLs provided by Mesa and XFree86 aren't the same. In particular,
> > the former can't use direct rendering, while the latter can't use plain
> > X11 rendering.
> > 
> > The libGLUs OTOH are both taken from the SGI sample implementation. _If_
> > there are any significant changes to libGLU, they will much more likely
> > appear in Mesa first. Maintaining xlibmesa-glu as well is a waste of
> > effort.
> 
> Why are you so gung-ho about killing libGLU?  

In order to stop the duplication of effort.

> What about libGLw?

I think the same reasoning applies to it, thanks for pointing that out.


-- 
Earthling Michel D�nzer   \  Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast  \     http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to