On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:40, Branden Robinson wrote: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > rev 238: ishikawa | 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003) | 8 lines > Changed paths: > M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha > M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386 > M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.i386 > M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.ia64 > M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.powerpc > M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.s390 > M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.sparc > > update MANIFESTs (add usr/X11R6/include/GL/glu.h) > > usr/X11R6/include/GL/glu.h will be installed even if libGLU does not build. > > glu.h is included in xc/include/GL. Imakefile in xc/include/GL/ does > not refer BuildGLULibrary YES or NO. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > IMO it's stupid to ship glu.h if we're not going to ship the rest of the > library.
This change doesn't ship it though, does it? > (Why can't XFree86 Build-Depend on libglu1-mesa-dev?) Actually, I think it'd have to Build-Depend on libglu-dev for glxinfo. > I object to killing off the X-forked GLU package at this point for that reason > and others. I'm looking forward to hearing them. Anyway, I agree that the commit in this form was probably premature and we should work this out in a branch first. -- Earthling Michel D�nzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
