On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:22:01AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Hmm. You're interpreting "all" as "any" and I'm interpreting it as > "every". Clearly "all" is not a good word to use there. :)
"all" just needs to be qualified a bit more...I qualified it it as "all hppa" whereas it could say "all architectures". > Yes, there are people that would like to do that. I think one problem > is that automake is hardly a more enticing solution. :) well, lots of debian packages use config.guess/config.sub. But that's not the part that bugs me - the steps behind that are little more than shell scripts packaged in Makefiles. (eg "World" target in the main Makefile) > Okay. Still, you can always browse the list archives: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/ ok - saved > > I can run builds on 650Mhz hppa boxes if I get pointed at a bk or CVS > > repository and make the results available via ftp or http. > > I can't exhaustively test the results though. > > At this point you'd need an account on my Subversion server to automate > this. hmm...well, if someone needs a snapshot built, I'm happy to pull an occasional tarball (once a month or so). > I'll communicate with him on the further resolution of this. I already (irc.parisc-linux.org). lamont will have time to bin-NMU when he gets home on Tuesday - he's on the road still now. > Thanks for bringing this issue to my attention. It doesn't really do > much to improve my poor opinion of GCC 3.3. :( welcome. FYI, I'm still seeing another gcc-3.3.1 problem building xfree86 4.2.1-9. gcc isn't finding stuff for C++ libraries: http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2003-August/020655.html I thought this was an hppa specific problem. hppa gcc maintainer watches parisc-linux list and we should hear from him....or from anyone who cares to muck with binutils. thanks, grant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
