On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 17:11, David Britton wrote: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=178242 > > someone who had a similar problem to me (looks to be a rash of bugs on > this same topic). I am having similar problems with the 4.3.0 > experimental pacakges.
Does that mean that the packages in sid work? > I apologize if this is not the correct project. I tried to extrapolate from > other bug reports I found, so hopefully I picked the correct one. You hit right on the mark; the report is very well written and informative in general, the lives of Debian maintainers would be easier if all bug reports were like this. :) I noticed a couple of things which I wonder if they're related: > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI G400 20020221 AGP 1x x86/MMX Does setting the MESA_NO_MMX environment variable make a difference? > (II) Loading sub module "mga_hal" > (II) LoadModule: "mga_hal" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_hal_drv.o > (II) Module mga_hal: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.2.0, module version = 1.0.0 > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 > (==) MGA(0): Matrox HAL module used Does not using the HAL module make a difference? > (**) MGA(0): Depth 24, (**) framebuffer bpp 32 Does running in depth 16 make a difference? > (**) MGA(0): VideoRAM: 32768 kByte Is this correct? > (--) MGA(0): Virtual size is 1600x1200 (pitch 1600) > (**) MGA(0): *Default mode "1600x1200": 229.5 MHz, 106.2 kHz, 85.0 Hz Does running at a lower virtual resolution make a difference? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
