Your message dated Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:41:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218371: xutils: dependency on gcc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2003 21:50:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 30 15:50:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.newsguy.com (newsguy.com) [129.250.170.69]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AFKh0-0000rT-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:50:58 -0600
Received: from homage (adsl-67-120-86-146.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.120.86.146])
by newsguy.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9ULouxH094493;
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:50:57 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from itz by homage with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AFKhI-0000sK-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:51:16 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xutils: dependency on gcc
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:51:15 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: xutils
Version: 4.2.1-6
Severity: wishlist
Why does the unstable version (not the one listed) suddenly depend on gcc-3.2?
The changelog is full of stuff about why gcc-3.3 won't work for building, but says
nothing about runtime.
I don't like having to install two different gcc's just to keep X up to date.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux homage 2.4.22custom1 #4 Fri Oct 3 19:15:17 PDT 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages xutils depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii xfree86-common 4.2.1-6 X Window System (XFree86) infrastr
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-16 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 218371-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2003 03:41:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 30 21:41:25 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AFQA8-0003wv-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:41:25 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 32D8064156; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:41:23 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:41:23 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#218371: xutils: dependency on gcc
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:51:15PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Package: xutils
> Version: 4.2.1-6
> Severity: wishlist
>=20
> Why does the unstable version (not the one listed) suddenly depend on gcc=
-3.2?
The Debian Bug Tracking System is not an appropriate forum for asking
questions. It is for reporting defects in the Debian system, or for
requesting enhancements.
> The changelog is full of stuff about why gcc-3.3 won't work for building,=
but says
> nothing about runtime.
If you'd read the changelog more carefully, you'd have seen the answers
you seek:
xfree86 (4.2.1-8) unstable; urgency=3Dhigh
[...]
* debian/control:
[...]
- xutils depends on cpp-3.2, because imake uses cpp (thanks, James Trou=
p)
(Closes: #196176)
[...]
xfree86 (4.2.1-7) unstable; urgency=3Dmedium
[...]
- Build-Depend on cpp-3.2; xbase-clients and xdm now Depend on cpp-3.2
instead of just cpp, since cpp-3.3 doesn't produce correct output (as
far as XFree86 is concerned) when the "-traditional" flag is used
("-traditional-cpp" doesn't work, either).
> I don't like having to install two different gcc's just to keep X up to d=
ate.
It's cpp you're installing, not gcc.
If you don't like having to install two versions of cpp, prevail upon
GCC upstream to fix the bug, or help them write regression tests that
keep these sorts of bugs from getting into their releases in the first
place.
In the future, mail questions like this to the debian-user mailing list,
please. If you cannot get an answer there, you may try the debian-x
mailing list.
But please don't abuse the Debian BTS as you have just done.
Closing this spurious report.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | That's the saving grace of humor:
Debian GNU/Linux | if you fail, no one is laughing at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | you.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- A. Whitney Brown
--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj+h2eIACgkQ6kxmHytGonxoMwCfelgaqsf6POJ6tQaryYeNnyFU
YKwAnRZkPilpRdFDGtnSubmOiUuZvTHx
=1q9m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
