Le 07/02/2011 09:53, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@ens-lyon.org> (07/02/2011): > >> xorg depends on many more packages than xserver-xorg does. My >> understanding is: When you want the minimal stuff, you install >> xserver-xorg. When you want almost everything to get a "normal" X >> running, you install xorg. But I didn't check if there was still a >> point in not installing xorg recently. >> > I'm tempted to say that if people want something really minimal, they > should be able to install xserver-xorg-{core,input-foo,video-bar}.
Ah, right, we wouldn't have xserver-xorg-core depend on {xserver-,}xorg anymore. > As > for x11-xkb-utils && xkb-data, they could be recommended/depended on > by the server (since xserver-xorg-core depends on xserver-xorg > currently). > > Also, we could make xorg depend on stuff listed in xserver-xorg, and > only recommend other packages. This way, people can still use the xorg > metapackage to get everything installed by default. And those who want > something more minimal can still ignore the recommends? > Fine too. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d4fb48f.6010...@ens-lyon.org