Christopher James Halse Rogers <[email protected]> (17/08/2011): > Does anyone have any objections to me merging this into either sid or > experimental (depending on preference)? It's now required for libdrm > multiarch, and hence for mesa multiarch, and I'd really, really like > to not be dependent on ia32-libs for mesa.
I haven't looked into the details (still busy with work etc.), but no objection in principle. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
