On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:42:26 +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > On 31 December 2011 02:14, Josselin Mouette <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is cogl which is at fault. Being built against GLES breaks basically > > everything that depends on it. > > armel/armhf only support GLES in hardware so it does make sense to > enable it for those platforms. > We should try and fix that support where broken, not disable it. > That means maintainers of all reverse deps have to special-case a platform where they can't test anything. Which means those packages will be broken. I think this arm special-case in clutter/cogl is a bad idea. Maybe we should just stop building mesa on arm entirely.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
