On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Witold Baryluk <bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl> wrote: > > So why there are two incompatible drivers, especially when radeon looks > to be providing framebuffer anyway? Is radeonfb module supporting even > some older hardware so it is keeped in kernel?
radeon covers all hw radeonfb covers and more. The reason radeonfb is still around is that it covers a few corner cases (suspend and resume on ppc mac cards) which hasn't been ported over to radeon yet. On x86, there is no reason to use radeonfb. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadnq5_o9uxr6oqssfcd13ua0vlcfcsh2gtteqnvpkswpyn6...@mail.gmail.com
