Sylvestre Ledru <[email protected]> (24/06/2012):
> Could you consider to use a more recent version of llvm ? We would like
> to remove llvm 2.9 from the archive (we have three implementations).

I'm pretty sure I'm not confident with last minute changes for mesa's
build-depends.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to