Your message dated Tue, 4 Jun 2013 20:57:22 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#711052: xserver-xorg-dev: Includefiles declare
external function, that are also declared in included includefiles
has caused the Debian Bug report #711052,
regarding xserver-xorg-dev: Includefiles declare external function, that are
also declared in included includefiles
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
711052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711052
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-xorg-dev
Version: 2:1.12.4-6
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Compilation of xserver-xorg-video-intel
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Compilation of xserver-xorg-video-intel
* What was the outcome of this action?
Lots of compilerwarnigs complaining about previous declarations.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
No warnings
1. randrstr.h includes rrtransform.h
In line 581 RRTransformCompute is declared, which is also declared in
rrtransform.h
2. xf86Modes.h includes xf86.h.
In lines 43 to 67 there are 10 functions, that are also declared in xf86.h:
xf86ModeHSync
xf86ModeVRefresh
xf86DuplicateMode
xf86DuplicateModes
xf86SetModeDefaultName
xf86SetModeCrtc
xf86ModesEqual
xf86PrintModeline
xf86ModesAdd
xf86CVTMode
Commenting these declarations in randrstr.h and xf86Modes.h removed the
warnings. As these functions are declared in included includefiles, there
are no undefined names.
Reinhard
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.10-rc4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages xserver-xorg-dev depends on:
ii libpciaccess-dev 0.13.1-2
ii libpixman-1-dev 0.26.0-4
ii libxkbfile-dev 1:1.0.8-1
ii x11proto-core-dev 7.0.23-1
ii x11proto-dri2-dev 2.8-1
ii x11proto-fonts-dev 2.1.2-1
ii x11proto-input-dev 2.2-1
ii x11proto-kb-dev 1.0.6-2
ii x11proto-randr-dev 1.4.0-1
ii x11proto-render-dev 2:0.11.1-2
ii x11proto-video-dev 2.3.1-2
ii x11proto-xext-dev 7.2.1-1
ii x11proto-xinerama-dev 1.2.1-2
xserver-xorg-dev recommends no packages.
xserver-xorg-dev suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:40:19 +0200, Reinhard Karcher wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-dev
> Version: 2:1.12.4-6
> Severity: minor
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
> * What led up to the situation?
> Compilation of xserver-xorg-video-intel
>
> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
> Compilation of xserver-xorg-video-intel
>
> * What was the outcome of this action?
> Lots of compilerwarnigs complaining about previous declarations.
>
> * What outcome did you expect instead?
> No warnings
That stuff is better tracked/fixed upstream. At least the randr ones I
think are fixed in master. Or at least have patches on xorg-devel.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
