Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 21:24:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: tagging 298778
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 22:10:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 09 14:10:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shire.symonds.net [69.93.152.234]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D99O3-0007aq-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:10:39 -0800
Received: from [59.92.137.173] (helo=majuli.appaji.net)
by shire.symonds.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.44)
id 1D99O4-00054W-5p
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:10:41 -0600
Received: from appaji by majuli.appaji.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D99iM-0000fs-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:01:38 +0530
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0728794746=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xlibs-data: alias names for _IN locales
Reply-To: Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:01:38 +0530
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============0728794746==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: xlibs-data
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
Severity: minor
Tags: patch l10n
This is a patch to add alias names corresponding to the _IN locales to
the /usr/lib/X11/locale/locale.alias file. The names are in accordance
with ISO 639:1988.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
-- no debconf information
--===============0728794746==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="x11-data-locale.alias.patch"
--- /usr/lib/X11/locale/locale.alias 2005-02-19 02:59:13.000000000 +0530
+++ locale.alias 2005-03-10 03:16:41.000000000 +0530
@@ -121,6 +121,8 @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED] br_FR.ISO8859-15
[EMAIL PROTECTED] br_FR.UTF-8
bn_BD bn_BD.UTF-8
+bengali bn_BD.UTF-8
+bangla bn_BD.UTF-8
bn_IN bn_BD.UTF-8
bs_BA bs_BA.ISO8859-2
bs_BA.ISO-8859-2 bs_BA.ISO8859-2
@@ -510,6 +512,7 @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gl_ES.ISO8859-15
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gl_ES.ISO8859-15
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gl_ES.UTF-8
+gujarati gu_IN.UTF-8
gu_IN gu_IN.UTF-8
gv gv_GB.ISO8859-1
gv_GB gv_GB.ISO8859-1
@@ -527,6 +530,7 @@
he_IL.microsoftcp1255 he_IL.CP1255
he_IL.microsoft-cp1255 he_IL.CP1255
he_IL.MICROSOFT-CP1255 he_IL.CP1255
+hindi hi_IN.ISCII-DEV
hi hi_IN.ISCII-DEV
hi_IN hi_IN.ISCII-DEV
hi_IN.isciidev hi_IN.ISCII-DEV
@@ -615,6 +619,7 @@
kl_GL kl_GL.ISO8859-1
kl_GL.iso88591 kl_GL.ISO8859-1
kl_GL.ISO-8859-1 kl_GL.ISO8859-1
+kannada kn_IN.UTF-8
kn_IN kn_IN.UTF-8
ko ko_KR.eucKR
ko_KR ko_KR.eucKR
@@ -673,8 +678,10 @@
mk_MK.microsoft-cp1251 mk_MK.CP1251
mk_MK.MICROSOFT-CP1251 mk_MK.CP1251
mk_MK.utf8 mk_MK.UTF-8
+malayalam ml_IN.UTF-8
ml_IN ml_IN.UTF-8
mn_MN mn_MN.UTF-8
+marathi mr_IN.UTF-8
mr_IN mr_IN.UTF-8
ms ms_MY.ISO8859-1
ms_MY ms_MY.ISO8859-1
@@ -747,6 +754,7 @@
om_ET om_ET.UTF-8
om_KE om_KE.ISO8859-1
om_KE.ISO-8859-1 om_KE.ISO8859-1
+punjabi pa_IN.UTF-8
pa_IN pa_IN.UTF-8
# Presumably, "pd" is "Pennsylvania 'Dutch'", a U.S. dialect of German.
# This is not an ISO language code defined for it, and the GNU C Library
@@ -876,10 +884,12 @@
sv_SE.iso885915 sv_SE.ISO8859-15
sv_SE.ISO-8859-15 sv_SE.ISO8859-15
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sv_SE.ISO8859-15
+tamil ta_IN.TSCII-0
ta ta_IN.TSCII-0
ta_IN ta_IN.TSCII-0
ta_IN.tscii ta_IN.TSCII-0
ta_IN.tscii0 ta_IN.TSCII-0
+telugu te_IN.UTF-8
te_IN te_IN.UTF-8
tg tg_TJ.KOI8-C
tg_TJ tg_TJ.KOI8-C
@@ -1182,6 +1192,8 @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: br_FR.ISO8859-15
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: br_FR.UTF-8
bn_BD: bn_BD.UTF-8
+bengali: bn_BD.UTF-8
+bangla: bn_BD.UTF-8
bn_IN: bn_BD.UTF-8
bs_BA: bs_BA.ISO8859-2
bs_BA.ISO-8859-2: bs_BA.ISO8859-2
@@ -1571,6 +1583,7 @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: gl_ES.ISO8859-15
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: gl_ES.ISO8859-15
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: gl_ES.UTF-8
+gujarati: gu_IN.UTF-8
gu_IN: gu_IN.UTF-8
gv: gv_GB.ISO8859-1
gv_GB: gv_GB.ISO8859-1
@@ -1588,6 +1601,7 @@
he_IL.microsoftcp1255: he_IL.CP1255
he_IL.microsoft-cp1255: he_IL.CP1255
he_IL.MICROSOFT-CP1255: he_IL.CP1255
+hindi: hi_IN.ISCII-DEV
hi: hi_IN.ISCII-DEV
hi_IN: hi_IN.ISCII-DEV
hi_IN.isciidev: hi_IN.ISCII-DEV
@@ -1676,6 +1690,7 @@
kl_GL: kl_GL.ISO8859-1
kl_GL.iso88591: kl_GL.ISO8859-1
kl_GL.ISO-8859-1: kl_GL.ISO8859-1
+kannada: kn_IN.UTF-8
kn_IN: kn_IN.UTF-8
ko: ko_KR.eucKR
ko_KR: ko_KR.eucKR
@@ -1734,8 +1749,10 @@
mk_MK.microsoft-cp1251: mk_MK.CP1251
mk_MK.MICROSOFT-CP1251: mk_MK.CP1251
mk_MK.utf8: mk_MK.UTF-8
+malayalam: ml_IN.UTF-8
ml_IN: ml_IN.UTF-8
mn_MN: mn_MN.UTF-8
+marathi: mr_IN.UTF-8
mr_IN: mr_IN.UTF-8
ms: ms_MY.ISO8859-1
ms_MY: ms_MY.ISO8859-1
@@ -1808,6 +1825,7 @@
om_ET: om_ET.UTF-8
om_KE: om_KE.ISO8859-1
om_KE.ISO-8859-1: om_KE.ISO8859-1
+punjabi: pa_IN.UTF-8
pa_IN: pa_IN.UTF-8
# Presumably, "pd" is "Pennsylvania 'Dutch'", a U.S. dialect of German.
# This is not an ISO language code defined for it, and the GNU C Library
@@ -1937,10 +1955,12 @@
sv_SE.iso885915: sv_SE.ISO8859-15
sv_SE.ISO-8859-15: sv_SE.ISO8859-15
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: sv_SE.ISO8859-15
+tamil: ta_IN.TSCII-0
ta: ta_IN.TSCII-0
ta_IN: ta_IN.TSCII-0
ta_IN.tscii: ta_IN.TSCII-0
ta_IN.tscii0: ta_IN.TSCII-0
+telugu: te_IN.UTF-8
te_IN: te_IN.UTF-8
tg: tg_TJ.KOI8-C
tg_TJ: tg_TJ.KOI8-C
--===============0728794746==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298778-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 19:29:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 12:29:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from main.uucpssh.org [212.27.33.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVaQL-0000Rx-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 12:29:45 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by main.uucpssh.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8A77BCB1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 May 2005 21:29:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by main.uucpssh.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id A6C387BCBA; Tue, 10 May 2005 21:29:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D05FF23E89; Tue, 10 May 2005 21:24:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:24:49 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Processed: tagging 298778
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:48:24AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> > # Denis Barbier asked the submitter for more information on 2005-03-10.
> > tags 298778 + moreinfo
> Bug#298778: xlibs-data: alias names for _IN locales
> Tags were: l10n patch
> Tags added: moreinfo
I received a private reply, but forgot to close this bug, doing it now.
Bug submitter was not aware that GNU libc maintainers do not want to add
new aliases to /etc/locale.alias, and hence agreed on closing this bug.
Denis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
