Sorry, my bad, I got the package name mixed up. The output of 'dpkg -S
libGL.so.1' is:
libgl1-mesa-glx:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1
libgl1-mesa-glx:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0
libgl1-mesa-glx:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1
libgl1-mesa-glx:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0
And the output of 'ldd /usr/bin/glxinfo' is:
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff9a3fe000)
libGLEW.so.1.10 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGLEW.so.1.10
(0x00007f0f30079000)
libGLU.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGLU.so.1
(0x00007f0f2fe0b000)
libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x00007f0f2fb89000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f0f2f886000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
(0x00007f0f2f54b000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXext.so.6
(0x00007f0f2f338000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f0f2ef8f000)
libXmu.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXmu.so.6
(0x00007f0f2ed75000)
libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXi.so.6 (0x00007f0f2eb64000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(0x00007f0f2e860000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x00007f0f2e64a000)
libXxf86vm.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXxf86vm.so.1
(0x00007f0f2e443000)
libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdamage.so.1
(0x00007f0f2e240000)
libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXfixes.so.3
(0x00007f0f2e03a000)
libdrm.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdrm.so.2
(0x00007f0f2de2d000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
(0x00007f0f2dc10000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f0f2da0c000)
libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1
(0x00007f0f2d7ec000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f0f30332000)
libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXt.so.6 (0x00007f0f2d586000)
libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXau.so.6
(0x00007f0f2d381000)
libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdmcp.so.6
(0x00007f0f2d17c000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSM.so.6 (0x00007f0f2cf75000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libICE.so.6
(0x00007f0f2cd59000)
libuuid.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007f0f2cb54000)
2014-02-26 6:14 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau <[email protected]>:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 22:58:28 -0300, Alejandro Carrazzoni wrote:
>
> > Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
>
> This is not the package containing libGL.
>
> > Version: 9.2.2-1
> > Severity: important
> > File: nouveau
> >
> > When using nouveau I didn't have 3d acceleration, running glxinfo gave
> the
> > following error:
> >
> > name of display: :0.0
> > libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/tls/nouveau_dri.so
> > libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/nouveau_dri.so
> > libGL error: dlopen /usr/lib/dri/nouveau_dri.so failed
> > (/usr/lib/dri/nouveau_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
> file or
> > directory)
> > libGL error: unable to load driver: nouveau_dri.so
> > libGL error: driver pointer missing
> > libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/tls/swrast_dri.so
> > libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so
> > libGL error: dlopen /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so failed
> > (/usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
> file or
> > directory)
> > libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so
> > libGL error: reverting to indirect rendering
> > display: :0 screen: 0
> > direct rendering: No (If you want to find out why, try setting
> > LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose)
> >
> > Because of multiarch nouveau_dri.so is currently in
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri
> > and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri but libgl isn't looking for them. I
> had to
> > change the LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH variable to get 3d accel to work.
> >
> Where's your libGL, and which package does it come from? (provide the
> output of 'ldd /usr/bin/glxinfo', and 'dpkg -S libGL.so.1')
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
>
