On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:13:04PM +0200, BubuXP wrote: > 2014-08-19 12:18 GMT+02:00 Vincent Cheng <[email protected]>: > > > > Hi, > > > > (Cc-ing [email protected]) > > > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:08 AM, BubuXP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > While compiling upstream snapshots for debian > > > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B7AdLMiZn4FzdGZNV2FpLWhPTkk > > > I found that valgrind is disabled. > > > Is this the expected behavior? > > > I'm not a programmer, just a power user, but reading in the debian/rules > > > file it has the following code: > > > > > > > > > DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH) > > > > > > ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH), linux) > > > valgrind = --enable-valgrind > > > else > > > valgrind = --disable-valgrind > > > endif > > > > > > > > > DEB_HOST_ARCH will report 'amd64' or 'i386' as values, but it will never > > > be > > > equal to 'linux' so valgrind will be always disabled. I suspect that > > > instead > > > of DEB_HOST_ARCH you should use the DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS variable, that > > > reports > > > 'linux' as value. > > > > Nice catch, thanks! > > > > (I guess that leads to another question, i.e. should we be building > > xserver-xorg-video-intel with --enable-valgrind by default? It looks > > like the change was added in 2:2.21.14-1, although due to the above > > typo xxv-intel in both sid and experimental have always been built > > with --disable-valgrind, and that's also the upstream default.) > > In version 2:2.21.14-1 valgrind was enabled by default, but after a > couple of hours version 2:2.21.14-2 was released with "Don't enable > valgrind on kfreebsd" in changelog. > So I think the above lines in debian/rules must change in: >
I am doubtfull about your "must". I do have a severe dislike of valgrind, it is super *slow*. Very happy about the new sanitize gcc targets. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140819131519.GA1979@gluino
