Your message dated Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:09:50 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#719059: pixman 0.30 add mips(32,64)r2 asm support,
then symbols changed
has caused the Debian Bug report #719059,
regarding pixman 0.30 add mips(32,64)r2 asm support, then symbols changed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
719059: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719059
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pixman
pixman 0.30 add asm accelerate support for mips(32,64)r2,
for mips64(el) and mipsn32(el), it has some mips sysmbols.
--
YunQiang Su
mips64-sysmbols.diff
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.32.6-1
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:46:09 +0200 Julien Cristau <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 13:48:30 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> > Package: pixman
> >
> > pixman 0.30 add asm accelerate support for mips(32,64)r2,
> > for mips64(el) and mipsn32(el), it has some mips sysmbols.
> >
> Why are these symbols exported? They sound like they should be
> internal, not part of the public ABI, and thus shouldn't need to be
> listed in the symbols file.
The bug which caused these symbols to be exported was 'fixed' in 0.32.6,
so I guess this can be closed now.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/pixman/commit/?id=6d2cf40166d81bfc63108504c8022dc4fec37ff5
Thanks,
James
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
