Your message dated Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:02:43 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#803382: xserver-xorg-video-qxl: Missing Build-Depends
on libglib2.0-dev and libssl-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #803382,
regarding xserver-xorg-video-qxl: Missing Build-Depends on libglib2.0-dev and
libssl-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
803382: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803382
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xserver-xorg-video-qxl
Version: 0.1.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
xserver-xorg-video-qxl fails to build from source in unstable/amd64 due
to missing Build-Depends on libglib2.0-dev and libssl-dev.
The full build log is attached or (an alternate build) can be viewed
here:
https://reproducible.debian.net/logs/unstable/amd64/xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.1.4-3.build1.log.gz
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
xserver-xorg-video-qxl.0.1.4-3.unstable.amd64.log.txt.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 13:34:19 +0000, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Source: xserver-xorg-video-qxl
> Version: 0.1.4-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: ftbfs
> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> xserver-xorg-video-qxl fails to build from source in unstable/amd64 due
> to missing Build-Depends on libglib2.0-dev and libssl-dev.
>
No, it fails because one of its dependencies is broken. Not a bug in
this package. Also, your attachment was broken.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
