On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 07:59:09PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > Hi > > My X uses 80M of VSZ but only 8M of RSS memory. The eight megabytes seams > reasonably for an X server but why is the VSZ part so high? Does every > program that runs under X request it from X and so raises X's memory > statistic?
Requested size is just the size of the memory footprint as it appears in the page table. My X server always reports about 160MB 'usage', likely because of the way AGP is implemented in the kernel; similarly, my 3D engine reports 160MB usage (for probably the same reason) when its RSS is only 32 (and even that's when my LOD cache has become oversaturated, but that's another matter). Basically, the VSZ is just the *potential* usage, whereas the RSS is *actual* usage. Pay no mind to VSZ for anything which does funky memory mapper tricks. As a simple test of this, do a malloc() on some egregriously large amount of memory (say, 64MB), but don't actually use it, and look as the VSZ vs. RSS of the program. Linux uses an allocate-on-demand policy for large allocations (technically, it mmap()s /dev/zero, and mmap is a nice generic interface to the pagetable), so even though it has 64MB of *potential* memory usage, only the memory which has actually been touched is actually allocated. It's a similar issue with the X server et al. -- Joshua Shagam /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML/RTF in email www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam X No Word docs in email mp3.com/fluffyporcupine / \ Respect for open standards
