Greetings Jake :) * J. R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001114 14:35]: > How about settling for remembering XF3.x isn't just for legacy hardware > and that the status doc is sub-par in several respects?
How so? It states that your card is not supported, and your card isn't supported? Sounds up to date to me. >:-> As for a roadmap, perhaps XF might not have a roadmap per se -- they know what X features they want to support, they know what platforms they want to migrate to, but as for knowing down to the individual graphics chipsets, perhaps they do not, > So, I am not asking for support assurances, but rather an > organizational roadmap. Ok. Normally when people ask, "what I can I expect in the future?" they mean "when will this be supported?" > Your name is familiar, but I don't know you. My name is probably familiar because I follow far too many mailing lists than the surgeon general recommends. Debian-x, debian-vote, (no longer debian-user -- that was finally too high-traffic for me :), OpenBSD misc and smp, bugtraq, secure programming, (no longer vulnerabilities-development, though I may add that again in the future :), EROS, and I used to be fairly active in SuSE before I found Debian. I dabble in sci.crypt and comp.sys.hp48, the latter used to be my form of food five years ago. :) I also help file and track bug reports at mozilla.org. My name is bound to pop up once in a while. Heheh. > > http://lists.suse.com/archives/suse-linux-e/2000-Jul/0466.html suggests > > two possible alternatives you may be amenable to. > Suse? You mean, there's another Linux distro? I should get out more... No no no -- did you read the thread? A user suggests two courses of action, neither of which involve installing SuSE. :) I'm sorry no such road map exist. :( Cheers. :) -- ``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really impressed down here, I can tell you.''
