"Christian T. Steigies" wrote: > > > So there is no way it can be in testing. > So it goes stable -> woody -> testing -> sid ? Which one should developers > run?
Stable (Potato) <- Testing (Woody) <- Unstable (Sid) You should probably be running whichever distribution your packages are built for. For example, if you maintain a package in Potato, you should have a Potato box lying around to compile with. If you're building a package for Woody, and it's already in the new Woody Pool, and you don't need for it to advance before Woody freezes, run Woody. If you're building a bleeding-edge package that depends on XFree86 4.0.2, glibc2.2, or some other libraries that didn't or won't make it to Woody, Sid is just fine (and a lot more fun ;). -- -=|JP|=- "Why, oh, why didn't I take the blue pill?" Jon Pennington | Atipa Linux Solutions -o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.atipa.com /\\ Kansas City, MO, USA | 816-595-3000 x1550 _\_V 6D04 39E0 CAE9 9ADA 2CA3 2EBE 898A 6C37 CA1E A29C
