On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 02:43:33PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > It certainly looks like the best solution I've seen to the problem.
Thanks!
> It's too bad that we're not likely to get this into policy for woody.
> Since non of the display managers are frozen yet (correct?) might we
> still be able to implement this "unofficially", presuming we get the
> maintainers to all agree on the implementation?
Yes, presuming we can. Ryan Murray has some objections but he hasn't
mailed the list with them yet.
Also, as I understand it, login.app isn't a display manager (though it
does some stuff with /etc/inittab which makes me uncomfortable), so the
only people affected are {g,k,w,x}dm.
--
G. Branden Robinson | It's not a matter of alienating
Debian GNU/Linux | authors. They have every right to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | license their software however we
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | like. -- Craig Sanders
pgpyuN5IhB5fR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
